Back to Home

A visual application guide

Choose in the image.
Read out by barcode.

Light-Seq uses patterned light to connect selected regions of fixed tissue to sequencing. Explore a distinctive research application of Mightex Polygon.

14 min exploration2 interactive labsLiterature + manufacturer sources
Conceptual fixed tissue with image-selected regions A, B and C connected to molecular barcodes of the same identities
Original schematic · colours identify barcode groups

01 / The application

Ask a molecular question
about something you can see.

Which tissue layer, boundary or scattered cell group should be compared? An image can define the selection. Mightex lists light-directed spatial profiling among Polygon applications. [4]

A

Compare tissue layers

The original Light-Seq study profiled layers of mouse retina using image-guided barcoding. [1]

Planning idea: define anatomical groups before assigning barcode reagents.

AAA

Collect a sparse population

The study also profiled selected groups of rare dopaminergic amacrine cells in retinal sections. [1]

Planning idea: give separated regions a shared barcode when the group is the intended unit of analysis.

Conceptual drawings inspired by the biological questions, not reproductions of tissue images or experimental data.

Fixed specimen

This workflow begins with fixed material, rather than live-cell stimulation.

Image-defined selection

A group can follow an irregular shape or include several disconnected regions.

Group-level interpretation

Illuminating individual cells does not by itself give every cell a unique sequencing identity.

Assay scope and spatial indexing: [1][2][4]

02 / Image → light → molecular identity

The DMD selects the location. The chemistry writes the label.

  1. 01

    Keep the context

    Start with fixed cells or tissue prepared for the assay. Retain an image of the specimen.

  2. 02

    Make a molecular handle

    Reverse transcription creates cDNA in place. Further preparation makes it accessible to barcode reagents.

  3. 03

    Choose the regions

    Use morphology, position or staining to define the groups you want to compare.

  4. 04

    Attach a barcode with light

    A barcode reagent docks on cDNA. UV in the selected regions enables a covalent link; exchange reagents between rounds.

  5. 05

    Build the library

    Release labelled cDNA, perform cross-junction synthesis, amplify and prepare the sequencing library.

  6. 06

    Decode the groups

    Sequence outside the microscope. Match barcode identities to the saved region manifest.

Workflow overview, with intervening processing steps omitted. Use the authors’ sample-specific protocols for experimental details. [2][3]

A light-dependent molecular linkA barcode strand docks on cDNA. Selected UV illumination covalently links it through a photocrosslinking group. Library processing later preserves the barcode association.AcDNA + docking sequenceDNA barcode reagentAselected UV illuminationcovalent linkConceptual topology · no nucleotide sequence or molecular scale
A docking interaction positions the reagent; light enables a stable link. Diagram does not show molecular structure.

A molecular tag, not a fluorescent colour.

Light-Seq uses DNA barcode strands containing a photocrosslinking group, CNVK. UV links the docked barcode to cDNA in selected regions. The barcode is subsequently read as sequence. [1][2]

PIC also uses light-directed molecular selection, but its photoactivation chemistry differs. A PIC protocol and a Light-Seq protocol are not interchangeable. [4]

03 / Build a spatial manifest

Different places can share a label.
Decide whether they should.

Assign the six illustrated regions, then follow the barcode rounds. The key design decision is which origins you need to distinguish after the material is pooled.

Interactive / barcode groups

Six regions. How many identities?

1. Choose a barcode, then click a region
Reference image + region plan6/6 assigned
Ideal projected UV maskUV off
No UV exposure at this stage

2. Step through the conceptual sequence

Reference image

Define the region-to-barcode plan before exposing the specimen.

Barcode A

R1 + R3

Planned group in the saved manifest.

Barcode B

R2 + R5

Planned group in the saved manifest.

Barcode C

R4 + R6

Planned group in the saved manifest.

Try “All share A”, then “Decode”: six selected regions become one barcode group.

Original synthetic field. This is a workflow model with ideal masks, not a molecular simulation. It predicts no reads, gene expression, yield, background or crosslinking efficiency. Editing a region restarts the sequence. The three barcodes are conceptual labels, not reagent sequences.

One shared barcode identifies one selected group. To distinguish its constituent regions, plan distinct barcode identities and a validated assay design. Cell size, projected pixel pitch and sequencing identity describe different things. [1][4]

04 / Registration matters

What you outline must match what you illuminate.

This geometry model isolates one practical tradeoff: a border margin can reduce illumination outside a target, while leaving some of the target unexposed.

Interactive / registration geometry

A good mask in the wrong place.

Move a square projection across a 40 × 40 µm target. Inset the mask to trade covered target area for a border margin.

+10 µm
0 µm

75%

Target area covered

25%

Mask area outside target

40 µm illustrative targetTarget boundaryProjected mask
Geometry only: sharp edges, one lateral offset, no distortion, scattering or chemistry. These percentages are area overlaps; they do not estimate molecular specificity, sequencing purity or instrument accuracy.

Verify at the specimen plane

Measure where projected boundaries land using an appropriate calibration sample. Test the field centre and edges.

Recheck after changes

Changing objective, camera geometry, adapter or sample position can invalidate the mapping. Save the transform with the masks.

Test the molecular result

A good overlay alone cannot establish clean barcoding. Assess background and group separation in the actual assay.

Engineering recommendations for a pilot, not measured tolerances or a validated margin rule.

05 / Build the optical path

Polygon supplies the pattern.
The assay needs a complete workflow.

The published study used a Polygon400 DP on an inverted Nikon microscope with 365 nm illumination. That historical configuration is evidence of the application, not validation of every current Polygon configuration. [1]

01 / OPTICAL CHAIN

365 nm source

Lightguide delivery

02 / OPTICAL CHAIN

Polygon DMD

Image-defined mask

03 / OPTICAL CHAIN

Microscope relay

UV-compatible path

04 / OPTICAL CHAIN

Fixed specimen

Registered target plane

Camera reference image → ROI map → projected maskAfter labelling → molecular processing → external sequencing
Functional chain, not a ray trace. The camera observes through the microscope; sequencing is a separate downstream process.

Candidates for a 365 nm review

G or DI with a lightguide input

The 2025 brochure lists 350–1000 nm for Polygon1000-G and the DI lightguide input. DI fibre and DL inputs start at 400 nm. A model’s transmission range does not establish a working assay. [5]

Check the whole chain

Source, optics, software, sample

Confirm UV throughput through the adapter, objective, filters and chamber. Measure irradiance at the specimen; a source power percentage is not an exposure dose. Verify camera support and calibration in the chosen PolyScan licence. [2][5][6]

How easy is the Polygon part?

Pattern design and calibration are packaged software functions. That can make drawing, changing and revisiting masks practical on a compatible microscope. [6] Sample preparation, barcode reagents, washing, library quality and analysis still require molecular-biology expertise. The published protocols span several days; optical exposure is only one part. [2][3]

This application uses UV photocrosslinking, with no two-photon writing system required. The cited work does not establish a turnkey Light-Seq kit or a universal minimum selectable feature size.

06 / Plan a pilot

Start with a question you can verify.

01 / Define

Choose the unit of analysis

Write down the comparison, sample preparation and region-to-barcode plan. Start with a well-characterised preparation before a scarce specimen.

02 / Verify

Separate optical and assay checks

First confirm registration and delivered UV. Then evaluate library quality, background labelling and separation of known groups with suitable controls and replicates.

03 / Preserve

Keep the map with the data

Save the reference image, masks, barcode manifest, transform and run settings. Agree on library format and barcode parsing with the sequencing team before acquisition.

Planning recommendations. The authors provide separate tissue and cultured-cell protocols, plus experiment-specific analysis code. [2][3][7]

Correct pattern, unexpected barcode?

Check the reagent identity, round order and saved manifest before interpreting the biology.

Signal near a selected boundary?

Investigate registration, out-of-region light and reagent carryover; use appropriate no-UV and reagent controls.

Weak or inconsistent library?

Review sample quality and molecular processing with the assay team. DMD frame rate cannot diagnose an RNA or library-preparation problem.

Need every cell resolved?

Design and validate distinct molecular identities. Fine optical targeting alone does not supply per-cell sequencing labels.

This guide is a system-planning overview. Follow the original protocols for reagent identities, wet-lab steps and validation. The illustrations and labs supply no exposure prescription or predicted biological result.

Have the biological question? Map the optical requirements.

Bring your sample, microscope, UV source and target regions. Define the optical integration alongside your molecular-protocol and sequencing support.

Discuss the optical setup

Evidence & further reading

Follow the experiment back to its sources.

The 2022 paper establishes the research application. Protocols describe sample-specific processing; current manufacturer documents inform the hardware review. Illustrations, interactive models and planning suggestions are original to this guide. Reviewed 18 October 2026.

  1. 01
    Kishi, Liu, West et al. · Nature Methods (2022)

    Original Light-Seq study, biological demonstrations and historical Polygon400 DP setup. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01604-1.

  2. 02
    Light-Seq tissue protocol · authors’ protocol (2022)

    Fixed-tissue preparation, light-directed barcoding, molecular processing and library preparation.

  3. 03
    Light-Seq cell barcoding · authors’ protocol, v2 (2022)

    Cultured-cell workflow and cell-mixing benchmark; a separate preparation from tissue.

  4. 04
    Mightex · PIC / Light-Seq application overview

    Manufacturer application context for light-directed molecular selection. PIC and Light-Seq use different chemistries.

  5. 05
    Polygon1000 · manufacturer brochure (2025)

    Model-specific wavelength ranges and lightguide versus fibre inputs.

  6. 06
    Mightex · PolyScan software

    Pattern design, calibration and supported hardware; confirm the camera and licence combination.

  7. 07
    Harvard Molecular Systems Lab · Light-Seq analysis code

    Authors’ analysis for cell mixing, retinal layers and amacrine-cell experiments.